I received this message from Professor Noam Chomsky this summer in response to my article Security or Demography: The West Bank Barrier as a Demographic Tool.
From: chomsky[at]MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: West Bank Barrier
Date: June 16, 2007 19:27:29 IDT
To: kris[at]harmonicminor.com
Interesting, and well done, but I’m quite skeptical about the value of such inquiries, for a number of reasons. Here’s a few.
You say it is a “highly contentious point” whether a barrier on the Israeli side of the Green Line would have achieved whatever security effects the Separation Wall does. I don’t agree with that at all. It’s an obvious point. In fact it could have achieved far better results, since it could be impregnable, patrolled heavily on both sides of the fence, etc. Furthermore, even accepting (for argument’s sake) the idea that for security Israel somehow needs intrusion into the West Bank, then why not just build a wall a fixed distance from the Green line, say 5 km (or whatever number one wants), thereby excluding the Maaleh Adumim salient and the Ariel salient, and the many other illegal communities? Plainly, that would be at least as effective for self-defense. The whole discussion seems absurd. I’ve followed the arguments, and they don’t stand up to a moment’s inspection. About as clear an evasion of the obvious as can be imagined. We should also be more than a little disturbed, I think, by the universal acceptance in the West that the question of “security” reduces to the security of Israelis, that is, to the rich and powerful state closely linked to the US and EU, while there is no security problem for those under the jackboot. The racism is stunning, even given the ineradicable imperial mentality. (more…)